top of page

NASA Did Not Land on the Moon, White Hat Intel


Former head of Roscosmos says NASA did not land on the Moon. Dmitry

Rogozin ex-director general of Russia's main space corporation explained, he

asked his leadership team to look into whether NASA had actually landed a

dozen astronauts on the Moon in the late 1960s and early 1970s. After all,

Rogozin reasoned, "It was not clear to me how the United States, at that level

of technological development of the '60s of the last century, did what they st ill

cannot do now?"


This comes after NASA admitted they can't go to the moon again because of

Technology that was lost after the 1960s (what kind of technology could have

been lost, while one of todays Smart Phone is more advanced than all NASA

computers combined together of the 1960s) .


Dmitry Rogozin investigation team found not one evidence NASA landed on

the moon. Russia had the technology to see where the moon landing was and

knew the specific landing site, but in real t ime of the moon landing there was

no photographs or documentation of the sit e and a half century later there is

st ill no evidence or photographs of any trace landings of NASA on the moon.


Dmitry claims a coverup with Russian space agency and NASA took place

and Russia did not want to EXPOSE NASA as fraud because they had good

relat ions and Russia was scared to break int ernat ional t ies with NASA.


With only one photo of the Earth taken by NASA in 30 years ( now there are

a few photographs the past 25 years but st ill the photos are t ime lapsed photos

and spliced together in sections , with the same excuse> because of clouds )

since the moon landings , its reported the one photo in existence was stripped

together in pieces due to clouds. _Today thousands of professional

photographers and editors use Edit ing tools and can change the exposure of

photos on computers and can clear ly see the photos of the moon, the Earth from

the 1960s as cut and PASTED .. Even photos from the 90s of Earth are clearly

computer cut and pasted.


In today's fast moving world of the internet and leaks hundreds of videos

emerge of NASA Astronauts who are caught using green screen. Float ing

with hidden wire harness, dropping objects in a supposed zero gravity

environment of space and so many other videos of Flies , mouses in NASA

videos in space.


Is it coincidence that Prescott Bush (Bush family) funded Hit ler (this is in

U.S. Archives and Google also has the data) and Operat ions Paperclip brought

the NAZIS over to the U.S. And created NASA. And was it coincidence that

Prescott Bush was inside YALE'S SKULL AND BONES secret society that

help create the CIA and years later George h w Bush would be the director of

the CIA and was also part of SKULL AND BONES ( that was once considered

conspiracy but now proven a true secret society).....


Is it all coincidence how NASA was created with NAZI'S?


How did Apollo 11 travel 500,000 (half a million miles) miles to the moon

and back with one tank of fuel? and travel through 25,000 miles of the

radiat ion belt and the radiat ion did not affect the electrical system? Why did

NASA never go back to the moon? Then claim they lost the technology to

travel back to the moon?


50 years ago NASA had technology in Shuttle crafts to travel 230,000 miles

away to the moon. This Shutt le needed only one tank of gas and could easily

(supposedly) travel through the Van Allen radiat ion belt with no problems////

today [they] ,[NASA] can and has ONLY travel 1/Thousandth of the distance

since 50 years ago.. back then [they] had technology that was only 1/millionth

as strong and capable of today's Smart phone...


Today all EVIDENCE of APOLLO 11 Shuttle craft/ blue prints and

original videos have been destroyed.... (nothing has been saved from this

historic journey and records)... All that remains are edited videos of a moon

landing that shows three different shadows from the different light ing sources

in some clips. No stars in the back ground (later added).


Only one photo of EARTH was made public for 50 years.


The astronauts were WARNED not to give interviews and seldom do.


By FACT If NASA did go to moon 50 years ago they would have technology

and videos to this day of life traveling to MARS & beyond now... But NASA

can't even duplicate their APOLLO 11 journey, even with the most

sophist icated computers and technology to this day that is 1 million t imes

stronger than in 1969.


All APOLLO 11 equipment DESTROYED. DESTROYED all original video

Tapes Original Blue prints. No one would ever do this destruction of a

historical land mark and journey in U.S. /World history unless they were

destroying evidence.


Today you can't get good phone service in the forest or far from the city in

high terrains or canyons or the oceans But evident ly back in 1969 you had

perfect technology to speak with astronauts 150,000 miles away?


The Radiation Field between the Earth and moon is 125,000 miles thick. To

this day they don't have the technology to travel through the Radiat ion Belt

NASA Astronauts Col. Terry Virts, Dr. Kathleen Rubins, and Dr. Kelly Smith

(NASA Engineer) say in official NASA videos that no one has gone beyond low

Earth orbit yet, through the Van Allen Belts of dangerous radiat ion.This means

no one has landed on the Moon yet. (Now all three NASA employees are

banned from talking to the public).


Think: how can a small Space Shuttle LEAVE the Earth. Which is spinning

1000 miles on it 's axis and flying through the universe at 4× t imes the speed of

a bullet . How does a NASA shutt le leave Earth to travel a half million mile s

round trip on a tank of gas, make through 25,000 miles of Radiat ion Belt, have

perfect radio communicat ion in 1969 when NASA only had less than

1/millionth of comput ing power of today's Smart phone? Why was all

EVIDENCE of APOLLO 11 destroyed?


This isn't about another election. This is about the End Game of false lies of

the Cabal and Fall of the Deep State, NASA, CIA, World Banks, Big Pharma,

Big Tech, DARPA, NASA and Deep State Military Intelligence Agencies.


Comments


bottom of page