top of page
Data we want it all
20:59

Data we want it all

Dr. John Campbell And we want it now. Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o102 Data should be fully and immediately available for public scrutiny 2009 - 2012 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/N... Governments spent billions stockpiling Tamiflu Majority of trials sponsored by manufacturer Papers ghostwritten, paid by the manufacturer Academics who requested access to the data for independent analysis were denied Godlee F. We want raw data, now. BMJ2009;339:b5405doi:10.1136/bmj.b5405. FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar Godlee F, Clarke M Why don’t we have all the evidence on oseltamivir?BMJ2009;339:b5351.doi:10.1136/bmj.b5351 pmid:19995815 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar Cohen D Complications: tracking down the data on oseltamivir. BMJ2009;339:b5387.doi:10.1136/bmj.b5387 pmid:19995818 FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar Doshi P Neuraminidase inhibitors—the story behind the Cochrane review. BMJ2009;339:b5164.doi:10.1136/bmj.b5164 pmid:19995813 FREE Full Text Today Despite the global rollout of covid-19 vaccines and treatments, the anonymised participant level data underlying the trials for these new products remain inaccessible to doctors, researchers, and the public This is morally indefensible for all trials, but especially for those involving major public health interventions. Pfizer’s pivotal covid vaccine trial, designed, run, analysed, and authored by Pfizer employees. The company and the contract research organisations that carried out the trial hold all the data. Pfizer has indicated that it will not begin entertaining requests for trial data until May 2025, (NCT04368728). Moderna data may be available … with publication of the final study results in 2022 Datasets will be available upon request and subject to review once the trial is complete Eestimated primary completion date 27 October 2022 (NCT04470427). AstraZeneca As of 31 December 2021 timelines vary per request and can take up to a year upon full submission of the request Regeneron’s phase III trial of monoclonal antibody therapy REGEN-COV Participant level data will not be made available to others EMU) Should the drug be approved, sharing will be considered Remdesivir US National Institutes of Health, (funders) The longitudinal data set only contains a small subset of the protocol and statistical analysis plan objectives In our view, there is no dilemma the anonymised individual participant data from clinical trials must be made available for independent scrutiny. US Food and Drug Administration, freedom of information request to the agency for Pfizer’s vaccine data UK, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency does not proactively release clinical trial documents Transparency and trust Transparent decision making is essential. At least three of the many companies making covid-19 vaccines have past criminal and civil settlements costing them billions of dollars The BMJ supports vaccination policies based on sound evidence. The same applies to treatments for covid-19 Data must be available when trial results are announced, published, or used to justify regulatory decisions. There is no place for wholesale exemptions from good practice during a pandemic. The public Has paid for covid-19 vaccines through vast public funding of research that takes on the balance of benefits and harms has a right and entitlement to those data, as well as to the interrogation of those data by experts. Pharmaceutical companies are reaping vast profits without adequate independent scrutiny of their scientific claims. The purpose of regulators is not to dance to the tune of rich global corporations and enrich them further; it is to protect the health of their populations. We need complete data transparency for all studies, we need it in the public interest, and we need it now.
川普的疫苗策略
01:23

川普的疫苗策略

低級黑傳媒報道 這兩天有很多韭菜同胞爲川大爺維爲疫苗站臺的事情感到很傷心 雖然這個事情我已經反覆強調過了,但是可能還有一些點沒有說清楚 川大爺在最近集會上對這個事情發出了正面的回應。首先川大爺強調,我們,不是我一個人,是我們所有人,拯救了幾千萬人的生命。 雖然現在疫苗導致很多傷亡, 但跟其他策略比已經是傷亡最小的途徑。現在是戰爭狀態,韭菜在意傷亡,是因爲他們看不到另外一個結局。 另外一種結局是什麼?川大爺說,就是1917年西班牙流感那樣,死了1億人。而我們都知道那場瘟疫根本不是流感,而是人爲製造的,福奇自己的寫的論文裏面就指出大部分人死於細菌感染。所以那場瘟疫也不是病毒,這場瘟疫多半也沒有任何的病毒,而是5G+PCR 其次川大爺強調,他推出了治療方案,和疫苗。爲什麼要強調這點?因爲這就是給韭菜反對強制疫苗的最好武器:治療方案。相信我不用再過多解釋EUA這個東西。 川大爺再再強調,原版疫苗是要過5-12年才推出來的。 這就是明擺着跟我們說,他把陰謀集團的進程加快提前了,我們都知道新世界秩序原本是2030年,結果今年他們就迫不及待的宣佈進入新世界秩序了。 如果像很多智障說的,川普就是深層政府的人,那他沒有必要推出治療方案,也沒有必要去保護一些特定的傳播真相的人。比如之前提到的JPeter Mcoullogh在採訪中明確說到,我有人保護的,威脅我的人全都完蛋了。 那爲什麼川大爺要宣佈自己打了第三針?這是政治決策+戰時決策。之前我們說過大多數韭菜是不瞭解Q或者深層政府的,所以川大爺必須要給一般韭菜一個交代, 接下來就是我的猜測加分析:川大爺確實打了,但川大爺是有醫療床的男人,不過這個不是重點。 川大爺打了過後其實就變成了受害人,而不是主使,倒時候跟韭菜也好交代,所有的鍋都是深層政府的,因爲這個事情法律上講總統一個人說了不算。之後CDC,FDA,NIH,疫苗廠全都要完蛋,大覺醒後就以疫苗爲線索扳倒深層政府把控的醫療產業。 但是大覺醒不會自己來,而是要靠韭菜同胞們的自發努力。這就是爲什麼川大爺沒有在1.20號行動。因爲光明勢力的目的不是扳倒深層政府,而是觸發人類的大覺醒。大覺醒需要時間,而20號過後就是大覺醒開始的時間。 再次強調,大覺醒計劃是已經得到川普顧問官方確認的計劃,這個計劃真實存在,來源是HBO的Q紀錄片,之前我有做過專題總結 目前看來大覺醒計劃的戰線有很多 首先是選舉,代表人物有林大爺,福林將軍,枕頭哥等等等等。 然後是醫療戰線,這條戰線也很慘烈,犧牲了很多人,相比之下被刪刪頻道真的不算什麼。 拯救小孩戰線,我們都知道這個戰線盟軍有長足的勝利,世界各地一直在發生淺層地震和淹水,光是這點來判斷,光明勢力已經獲得絕對優勢。一大批政客也因爲小朋友的事情被抓。 媒體戰線,這是最表面的戰線,之前完全看不到白帽子的痕跡,但是最近風向開始大變,紛紛開始報到敏感話題。網絡最大流量明星 Joe Rogan也已經開始宣傳疫苗問題還有藥物問題,也邀請了英雄醫生去做採訪。 金融戰線,世界各地銀行紛紛斷網,金融系統網絡不穩定,並且伴隨大量銀行倒閉,甚至恆大也垮掉了。今年的深層政府峯會也宣佈取消。 Picture from : https://t.me/joeytrump/4109 From Telegram : joeytrump/4109 「Look, we did something that was historic. We saved tens of millions of of lives worldwide... We got a vaccine done in less than 9 months that was supposed to take from 5 to 12 years. Because of that vaccine, because of that vaccine, millions and millions of people I think that would have been a Spanish flu of 1917, were up to a hundred million people died. That was going to ravish the country far beyond what it is right now. Take credit for it. Take credit for it. What we have done is historic. Don't let them take it away. Don't take it away from ourselves. You are playing right into their hands when you're sort of like "oh the vaccine". If you don't want to take it you shouldn't be forced to take it. No mandates. But take credits because we saved tens of millions of lives. Take credit. Don't let them take that away from you. You agree with that ?」
bottom of page